addiann - 2004-08-23 16:01:22
indeed! "that's that with that." It's your blog, you get to say whatever you want in it. Whatever.
kookla - 2004-08-23 20:00:36
I could not agree more. Is she afraid someone will read your review and then not give her work?? I mean, I love your journal and all Jim, but wasn't aware you had that much power out there in L.A. Perhaps you're being read in wider circles than we knew?
JANE - 2004-08-23 21:25:27
BTW, it would be LIBEL: " a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt (2) : defamation of a person by written or representational means. (SLANDER is always spoken, I believe. Just a little trot through the online dictionary.)
addiann - 2004-08-24 09:48:51
Besides, critics don't fall into the libel category, seeing as they're "critics". And this issue came up recently it seems to me (as well as being much talked-about in blogs) that criticism of work put out there for public consumption was just that, criticism. Not libel.
Cal - 2004-08-24 15:48:09
Also, it's only libel if it's not, you know, true.

add your comment:

your name:
your email:
your url:

back to the entry - Diaryland